Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Argus Bean camera  (Read 1378 times)
Nalgene Ninja
General Pain-in-the-butt
Global Moderator
Trail Junkie
*****
*
*
*

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Big Creek Trail
Posts: 890
Referrals: 0



« on: February 04, 2009, 10:14:01 AM »

Hey I just wanted to get some opinions on this lil' cheapo camera I saw in Wally World last week. I've been wanting a cheap lil' camera that I can keep out while hiking and not have to baby it like my wife's Fuji S-100. This thing looks perfect for snapping to my shoulder strap D-ring.

http://www.walmart.com/ca...ct.do?product_id=10216835
Logged

Stolen water is sweet; And bread eaten in secret is pleasant  Proverbs 9:17

Nalgene Ninja
General Pain-in-the-butt
Global Moderator
Trail Junkie
*****
*
*
*

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Big Creek Trail
Posts: 890
Referrals: 0



« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2009, 04:08:12 PM »

Alright, you can atleast tell me the camera sucks, and I should double down and get a real one.  Smiley
Logged

Stolen water is sweet; And bread eaten in secret is pleasant  Proverbs 9:17

montysano
Trail Enthusiast
***
*

Karma: 15
Offline Offline

Posts: 199
Referrals: 1



« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2009, 05:00:39 PM »

Looks pretty sucky to me.  3.2MP is getting down in cellphone camera range.  But it has good reviews, and you can't beat the price.

I still drag one of these around, or sometimes one of these.  No babying required   laugh

Logged

A few minutes ago every tree was excited, bowing to the roaring storm, waving, swirling, tossing their branches in glorious enthusiasm like worship. But though to the outer ear these trees are now silent, their songs never cease.  --  John Muir
JC785
Trail Climber
****
*

Karma: 25
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Quillian Creek
Posts: 453
Referrals: 1



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2009, 05:02:42 PM »

Honestly I dont know to much about cameras but I think it would be pretty good for backpacking! The megapix is 3.2 which is not that high but would be aight for general picture taking on the trail. Sorry for not much help.
Logged

Joshua Szulecki
Global Moderator
Trail Junkie
*****
*
*
*
*

Karma: 121
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Trails? Where we're going we don't need trails.
Posts: 1,713
Referrals: 0



WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2009, 06:14:43 PM »

For snapshots, fine.

For anything else, forget it.
Logged

McDowra
Trail Climber
****
*
*
*

Karma: 20
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Eagle Creek- Little Ugly
Posts: 392
Referrals: 0



WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2009, 08:04:02 PM »

My camera took these and it is a Kodak DX6340 3.1 megapixel. Which while we are getting opinions, what do you guys think about the Kodak Z1015?
Logged

"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."  Emerson

http://community.webshots.com/user/mcdowra
auwesman
Ninja
Trail Enthusiast
***
*

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 192
Referrals: 0



« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2009, 08:35:14 PM »

3.2 MP can be ok if you don't plan on blowing it up past 5X4 or if you don't crop.

I just thought it was hilarious that all the review start with, "I bought this camera for my 7 year old...."  Grin
Logged
Joshua Szulecki
Global Moderator
Trail Junkie
*****
*
*
*
*

Karma: 121
Offline Offline

Favorite Trail: Trails? Where we're going we don't need trails.
Posts: 1,713
Referrals: 0



WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2009, 07:52:18 AM »

Try to keep in mind that besides limiting how large of a print you can make, megapixels do not equal quality. Several of the original dSLR models were under 6MP, many in the 3MP range, and they still generate sharper, more colorful, and just generally better photographs than 90% of modern point and shoot cameras. There is a megapixel myth.

That said... This camera only has digital zoom (don't use digital zoom), and doesn't specify what kind of lens. That means it is probably fixed focus and plastic. Fixed focus lenses are "always" in focus, but you lose a lot for that compromise, including really deep DOF, usually a fixed aperture setting which means the only exposure control is via the shutter (which you definately don't control). Plastic lenses suck. Period. They make lenses out of glass, and very GOOD glass, for a reason.

For very basic snapshots it will be fine. I wouldn't let it get close to a birthday party, important hike, or anything else that you want to have a good photo of, but for proof-of-sight purposes (like going, hey, look what I found), it is fine. I carry a fairly crummy P&S camera for proof-of-sight purposes many times when I leave my camera gear at home.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.